Featured Snippets Drop

Included Snippets Drop

image

On February 19, MozCast measured a significant drop (40% day-over-day) in SERPs with Featured Snippets, without any immediate signs of recovery. Here's a two-week view (February 10-23):.

Are we losing our minds?

After the year we have actually all had, it's always excellent to check our sanity. In this case, other data sets revealed a drop on the same date, but the seriousness of the drop differed drastically. I inspected our STAT data throughout desktop questions (en-US just)-- over two million everyday SERPs-- and saw the seo Expert Gold Coast following:.

While mobile SERPs in STAT showed greater general frequency, the pattern was extremely similar, with a 9% day-over-day-drop on February 19 and an overall drop of about 12% because February 10. Keep in mind that, while there is considerable overlap, the desktop and mobile data sets may consist of various search expressions. While the desktop information set is presently about 2.2 M everyday SERPs, mobile is closer to 1.7 M.

Note that the MozCast 10K keywords are skewed (deliberately) toward much shorter, more competitive phrases, whereas STAT includes many more "long-tail" phrases. This describes the general higher frequency in STAT, as longer expressions tend to consist of questions and other natural-language questions that are most likely to drive Featured Snippets.

Why the huge difference?

What's driving the 40% drop in MozCast and, most likely, more competitive terms? First things first: we've hand-verified a variety of these losses, and there is no proof of measurement mistake. One practical aspect of the 10K MozCast keywords is that they're uniformly divided across 20 historical Google Ads categories. While some modifications effect industry classifications likewise, the Featured Bit loss revealed a dramatic series of effect:.

Competitive health care terms lost more than two-thirds of their Included Snippets. It ends up that many of these terms had other prominent features, such as Medical Understanding Panels. Here are some high-volume terms that lost Featured Snippets in the Health category:.

diabetes.

lupus.

autism.

fibromyalgia.

acne.

While Finance had a much lower initial occurrence of Featured Snippets, Financing SERPs likewise saw massive losses on February 19. Some high-volume examples consist of:.

image

pension.

risk management.

shared funds.

roth individual retirement account.

financial investment.

Like the Health classification, these terms have an Understanding Panel in the right-hand column on desktop, with some standard information (primarily from Wikipedia/Wikidata). Once again, these are competitive "head" terms, where Google was showing several SERP features prior to February 19.

Both Health and Financing search phrases line up carefully with so-called YMYL (Your Money or Your Life) material areas, which, in Google's own words "... might potentially affect an individual's future joy, health, monetary stability, or safety." These are areas where Google is plainly worried about the quality of the responses they supply.

What about passage indexing?

Could this be connected to the "passage indexing" update that rolled out around February 10? While there's a lot we still do not understand about the effect of that upgrade, and while that upgrade impacted rankings and very likely impacted organic snippets of all types, there's no reason to believe that update would affect whether a Featured Snippet is displayed for any provided question. While the timelines overlap slightly, these events are most likely separate.

Is the snippet sky falling?

While the 40% drop in Featured Snippets in MozCast seems real, the impact was mostly on much shorter, more competitive terms and particular industry categories. For those in YMYL categories, it definitely makes good sense to assess the influence on your rankings and search traffic.

Normally speaking, this is a typical pattern with SERP features-- Google ramps them up in time, then reaches a limit where quality begins to suffer, and then reduces the volume. As Google becomes more positive in the quality of their Included Bit algorithms, they may turn that volume back up. I definitely do not expect Included Snippets to vanish any time quickly, and they're still really prevalent in longer, natural-language inquiries.

Think about, too, that some of these Featured Snippets might just have been redundant. Prior to February 19, someone looking for "shared fund" may have seen this Included Bit:.

Google is assuming a "What is/are ...?" concern here, but "shared fund" is an extremely uncertain search that might have multiple intents. At the very same time, Google was currently showing a Knowledge Chart entity in the right-hand column (on desktop), probably from relied on sources:.

At the exact same time, while it might sting a bit to lose these Featured Bits, think about whether they were truly providing. In many cases, they may be jumping straight to the Knowledge Panel and not even taking the Included Bit into account.

For Moz Pro clients, keep in mind that you can quickly track Featured Bits from the "SERP Features" page (under "Rankings" in the left-hand nav) and filter for keywords with Included Bits. You'll get a report something like this-- try to find the scissors icon to see where Included Snippets are appearing and whether you (blue) or a rival (red) are capturing them:.

image

Whatever the impact, something remains true-- Google giveth and Google taketh away. Unlike losing a ranking or losing an Included Bit to a competitor, there's very little you can do to reverse this type of sweeping modification. For websites in heavily-impacted verticals, we can just keep an eye on the circumstance and try to evaluate our new reality.

Update: Visit word-count.

I realized that we could look at word-count in the STAT data to evaluate the theory that much shorter search queries (which are generally both more competitive and more unclear) were struck harder by this update. Here's the breakdown of STAT's 2M desktop (en-US) keywords ...

There's very little nuance here-- 1-word questions were clobbered in this upgrade, 2-word queries dropped significantly greater than the STAT average, and 3+- word questions were struck much less. Why these questions were struck isn't as clear, however the influence on extremely short inquiries is clear.